deutsch
english

Survey for Lab Courses  -  Only for Preview !

Ein Klick auf die deutsche Flagge führt zur deutschen Version
Warning: If you click on a language symbol, all your previous entries will be discarded !!

General Questionnaire: An e-mail will be sent end of January 2011 to all students of the Faculty of Technical Sciences.
Please check your e-mail address (forename.surname@department.stud.uni-erlangen.de)! 

Personal Information

My Homework

The two following questions ask for aspect ratios. To this you should know, how many contact hours (SWS) are applied in your examination regulations (or rather in UnivIS) for this lab course, though 1 contact hour equates to = 14 * 45 min. = 10,5 h (à 60 min.).

- Example: If 3 contact hours (3 SWS) are applied for your lab course, then you have 31,5 h for the whole semester.
- Lab time means the sum of retention time in the lab for the whole semester. 

Lab Course - Introduction

The general introduction to the lab course was sufficient. applies  doesn´t apply   
Formal needs and expectations of the tutors were made clear well. applies  doesn´t apply   
Relations and crosslinks to other subject areas were presented. applies  doesn´t apply   

Lab Course - Organisation

The complementary material well supported the experimental procedure. applies  doesn´t apply   
Group assignment and group size were fair. applies  doesn´t apply   
The technical and space equipment was well. applies  doesn´t apply   

Lab Course - Content and Execution

The sequence of the experiments and their structure were well thought-out. applies  doesn´t apply   
The conceptual formulations were well structured and self-explanatory expressed. applies  doesn´t apply   
The contents were well synchronized with other lectures. applies  doesn´t apply   

Lab Course - Experiment Preparation and Postprocessing

In my opinion the style and amount of the requested experiment preparation were moderate. applies  doesn´t apply   
In my opinion the style and amount of the requested experiment postprocessing were moderate. applies  doesn´t apply   

Lab Course - Tutors

The tutors showed up well prepared. applies  doesn´t apply   
There was a reasonable amount of assistance through the tutors. applies  doesn´t apply   
The tutors created a pleasant working atmosphere. applies  doesn´t apply   

General Impression

There was a good relationship between learning success and expenditure of time. applies  doesn´t apply   
My overall rating for this lab course is: 1 = very good  6 = very poor   

Further Comments

Please restrict the comments to this lab course, its relevance to the study program, the tutor (please mention the name, if there are several tutors), the evaluation and the questionnaire itself. Other comments should be inserted into the General Questionnaire of the Faculty of Engineering Sciences. 

Questions Defined by the Tutor

The possibly following optional questions were defined by the tutor only for his information, they have no relevance for the central evaluation process. 
Thank you for participating in the evaluation of WS 2010/11.
Prof. Dr.-Ing. M. Wensing, Dean of Studies
Jürgen Frickel, Evaluation Coordinator